Federal ICAC now

Speaker Bronwyn Bishop charges $5000 for chopper to fundraiser

Case for Federal ICAC
Dubious Travel Claims | Liberal Party | QED
Liberal Party

Speaker Bronwyn Bishop charges $5000 for chopper to fundraiser

5 November 2014

Former speaker of the House Bronwyn Bishop chartered a helicopter to travel from Melbourne to Geelong and back to attend a state Liberal Party fundraiser. The journey typically takes an hour each way by road. The cost of the flights was $5,227.27.

She initially refused to resign over the expenses claim, describing it as an “error of judgement”. However, she agreed to pay back the sum of the helicopter flight plus a penalty of $1,307. It later emerged that also  in 2014, Bishop and four parliamentary delegates spent $88,084 on a two-week trip to Europe in her bid for presidency of the Inter-Parliamentary Union, including almost $1000 a day on private limousines.

 Bishop also charged taxpayers more than $3,300 for car expenses to attend the opera and other arts events from 2010 to 2013.

Bishop eventually resigned the speakership on 2 August 2015.

She announced in December 2015 that she intended to recontest her seat of Mackellar, claiming she had been “exonerated” over “Choppergate”. However, Bishop was defeated in the pre-selection battle by Jason Falinski, who retained Mackellar for the Liberals at the 2016 election.

What's a rort?

Conflicts of Interest

Redirecting funding to pet hobbies; offering jobs to the boys without a proper tender process; secretly bankrolling candidates in elections; taking up private sector jobs in apparent breach of parliament’s code of ethics, the list goes on.

Deceptive Conduct

Claiming that greenhouse gas emissions have gone down when the facts clearly show otherwise; breaking the law on responding to FoI requests; reneging on promised legislation; claiming credit for legislation that doesn’t exist; accepting donations that breach rules. You get the drift of what behaviour this category captures.

Election Rorts

In the months before the last election, the Government spent hundreds of millions of dollars of Australian taxpayers’ money on grants for sports, community safety, rural development programs and more. Many of these grants were disproportionally awarded to marginal seats, with limited oversight and even less accountability.

Dubious Travel Claims

Ministerial business that just happens to coincide with a grand final or a concert; electorate business that must be conducted in prime tourist locations, or at the same time as party fundraisers. All above board, maybe, but does it really pass the pub test? Or does it just reinforce the fact that politicians take the public for mugs?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This