Mitsubishi Motors Australia Limited

4 year total income$8,385,483,767
4 year taxable income$3,434,856
4 year tax payable$0
Tax Rate0.00%

It reports good profits, five years of sales growth, and it is paying handsome dividends to its Japanese parent – but Mitsubishi is still paying no income tax after ten years.

Like other automakers, Mitsubishi continues to rely on a mountain of tax losses to offset against its profits. Its most recent financial statements show the directors recommended $56 million in cash dividends be paid to the parent last year. It was $73 million the year before.

Revenue rose from $2.2 billion to $2.5 billion in 2018, profit before tax eased back from $78 million to $63 million.

The accounts show the company struck a deal with the Tax Office in 2009 where the ATO recognised almost $600 million in tax losses. That is almost used up now. As of March 2018, Mitsubishi had expended $587 million of its $597 million available losses and continues to carry forward $9.4 million in the present year.

So, if it keeps making a profits this year, this foreign carmaker might even find itself in the the exotic position of being a foreign carmaker which actually pays tax in Australia. No doubt its accountants from EY will be working assiduously to stop this happening.

Public support is vital so that we can continue to investigate and publish articles that tell truth to power. Subscribe with a monthly contribution if you can, see below. Join our newsletter, share and like posts, if you can not make a financial contribute.


We are counting down the Top 40 Tax Dodgers. There are now four years of tax transparency data published by the Tax Office and we have used this data to work out which large companies operating in Australia have paid the least tax, or no tax.

Notable new economy players such as Google, eBay,, Expedia are not near the top of the ATO list. That’s because they don’t (yet) recognise all income earned here; instead, they book Australian revenue directly to their associates offshore. They will be ranked in due course.

For other large corporations, and in particular, multinationals, the main steps in avoiding tax are made by reducing their taxable as much as they can; usually by sending it offshore in interest on loans, “service” fees or other payments to foreign associates. So, we have set a threshold. We have included only those companies which managed to wipe out 99.5 per cent or more of their taxable income over four years.

Qantas, therefore, is not on this list, although it has enormous income and has paid no income tax in Australia for many years. It misses the cut-off due to it not eliminating more than 99.5 per cent of its total income.

The airline had made large losses which were offset against profits. Many large corporations which have paid zero tax in ATO data, have legitimately made losses and have therefore built up “tax-loss shelter”.

Further explanation of methodology can be found here.

Many others however, such as ExxonMobil and EnergyAustralia, are on the list as they managed to eliminate all or most of their taxable income by “debt-loading” or other means of aggressive tax avoidance.

In this, the second iteration of corporate tax rankings, we have ranked companies purely on the Tax Office data. We will also publish a list of Australia’s better corporate taxpayers, those companies who contribute most to the country in which they operate.

The Tax Office data is not a perfect guide. It does not record refunds, only tax payable and is often at odds with disclosures made for accounting purposes. In some cases, there are multiple entities with the same ultimate offshore parent reporting. One entity may pay zero tax, another may pay at the statutory 30 per cent rate (even if on low taxable income). We endeavour to be fair in our reporting to recognise these issues.

The data also recognises trusts as well as companies. For trusts, it is the members (investors) rather than the trusts who are ordinarily required to pay the tax. In many cases however it is fair to recognise trust structures for what they are, as tax is often the main reason these vehicles have been structured as trusts.

Companies are welcome to debate their rankings or to touch base to clarify or defend their tax practices. We will append or link these submissions.

Hydrox has been taken off the list as it never made a profit.

Michael West Email

Get Our Weekly Newsletter

Unsubscribe anytime.

Thank you! We'll also confirm via email.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This