Did anybody notice the country’s annual emissions data? It was six months old, lost in the festive season scramble and not good news. Freelance journalist, Peter Boyer, who was awarded an OAM for services to conservation and the environment, particularly in the fields of climate science and awareness, reports.
I don’t mean the red in shop windows or bus drivers in Santa hats, of which I thoroughly approve, nor the bright glow lighting up the dark of a northern winter as a huge wildfire eats into the outskirts of Los Angeles. (Whoever heard of such a thing?)
The red I’m seeing is caused by a malignant trend in public life: the wilful, calculated, planned use of the festive season to disguise government failure to meet its obligations.
In this case it’s about accounting for national carbon emissions as required under an international agreement to which we’re party, and the principal culprits are environment and energy minister Josh Frydenberg and prime minister Malcolm Turnbull.
I’d rather not keep coming back to this issue year after year, but it’s getting to me. Climate change is not just some trivial idea to be tossed aside at will. It’s real and it’s dangerous, and in failing to take their reporting obligations seriously the minister and his leader are seriously negligent.
This latest example of government misbehaviour also happened last year. By rights the pair should be made publicly accountable, and applying their own party’s law-and-order mantra about repeat offenders they should at the very least lose their jobs. Fat chance, I know.
The emissions data released before Christmas takes us up to June 2017, fully six months ago. The government has had all that time to put it out there for public and parliamentary scrutiny. But this matter of crucial importance was relegated to a footnote that got buried in the Christmas rush.
australia's emissions have increased 4 years in a row.
in releasing the numbers, @JoshFrydenberg said the results show the coalition’s "approach to meeting its international climate commitments was working as planned". 🤷♂️https://t.co/UqJhAI8HjV pic.twitter.com/xUbwSY4hHG
— simon holmes à court (@simonahac) January 2, 2018
One of the messages from the June data is that electricity generation, while it remains the main source of emissions, showed marked improvement in 2016-17, an encouraging sign that new wind and solar power, despite the looming end of the renewable energy target, is having an impact.
But there are big concerns elsewhere. The Rudd and Gillard governments failed to incorporate petrol and diesel emissions in their carbon pricing schemes, and then the Abbott government made things worse by abolishing all carbon pricing.
In 2016-17, emissions from transport rose by 0.9 per cent and from non-electrical stationary energy by 3.3 per cent. These sectors’ combined emissions, mainly from burning petrol and diesel, now exceed those from electricity generation, yet both major parties continue to ignore them.
Australia's greenhouse gas emissions increase for third consecutive year – ABC Online https://t.co/ppYyLfonMH
— #aupol news (@AupolNews) December 19, 2017
This troublesome issue will only get bigger while we fail to curb liquid fuel emissions. Bipartisan agreement seems the only way out, but in the absence of agreement on how, or whether, a price should be put on carbon, that looks out of the question.
The Turnbull Government’s National Energy Guarantee, which is being heavily promoted in the government’s climate policy review, does no more than shut the stable door after the horses have bolted. It will do little to cut electricity emissions and will not affect petrol and diesel use.
Expectations were low ahead of the release of the policy document this month, but even so it’s a big disappointment. Having set weak emission targets for 2020 and 2030, the government seeks to avoid heavy lifting by using foreign carbon credits while relaxing the obligations of business.
We have nothing to look forward to in 2018. Malcolm Turnbull may be a better policy salesman than Tony Abbott, but the awkward truth is that, just like his predecessor, while having no climate measures of any substance to offer he hoodwinks electors into thinking all is as it should be.
It isn’t. National climate policy is a shambles. Frydenberg’s attempts to hide emissions data show that he knows the figures are damning, yet he and his leader continue to play games with us.
We need an explanation, and they need to be called to account. They will be hoping the silly season erases all this from people’s memories. I hope and expect they’ll be proved wrong.
Peter Boyer is a member of Al Gore’s Australian Climate Reality since 2006; founder of Climate Tasmania, 2007; current member of Climate Action Hobart; and a freelance writer at The Mercury with a focus on climate change and energy.