Federal ICAC now

Michael Danby: charged public for trips to Queensland with wife

Case for Federal ICAC
Deceptive Conduct | Dubious Travel Claims | Labor | QED
Labor Banner

Michael Danby: charged public for trips to Queensland with wife

2010, 2012, 2015, 2017

​The Melbourne-based Labor MP Michael Danby charged taxpayers nearly $7,500 for flights, Commonwealth limousines and taxis for three trips to Queensland with his wife during which he conducted no parliamentary business, according to the Sydney Morning Herald.

Danby charged taxpayers almost $15,000 for flights and other expenses linked to six trips to Queensland with his wife dating back to 2010. Danby said he reimbursed the Commonwealth in 2017 for three trips after auditing his expenses. In 2017, the expenses scandal brought down former health minister Sussan Ley.

In 2017, Danby used $4574 of taxpayers’ money to design and book two advertisements in the Australian Jewish News criticising the work of ABC journalist Sophie McNeill and took a week’s sick leave shortly after the 2016 election, while Parliament was sitting, and spent the time travelling in Israel.

In 2010, Danby spent a work-free week on the Gold Coast with family, at a cost of $1989.33.

In July 2012, he spent a week in Cairns, charging taxpayers $3363.96 for flights, cars and his wife’s travel. He returned to the Gold Coast in January 2015, spending another $2000.

Danby said the charges to the taxpayer resulted from errors made by his office, because he used the same booking agent for personal and business travel.

Read more.

What's a rort?

Conflicts of Interest

Redirecting funding to pet hobbies; offering jobs to the boys without a proper tender process; secretly bankrolling candidates in elections; taking up private sector jobs in apparent breach of parliament’s code of ethics, the list goes on.

Deceptive Conduct

Claiming that greenhouse gas emissions have gone down when the facts clearly show otherwise; breaking the law on responding to FoI requests; reneging on promised legislation; claiming credit for legislation that doesn’t exist; accepting donations that breach rules. You get the drift of what behaviour this category captures.

Election Rorts

In the months before the last election, the Government spent hundreds of millions of dollars of Australian taxpayers’ money on grants for sports, community safety, rural development programs and more. Many of these grants were disproportionally awarded to marginal seats, with limited oversight and even less accountability.

Dubious Travel Claims

Ministerial business that just happens to coincide with a grand final or a concert; electorate business that must be conducted in prime tourist locations, or at the same time as party fundraisers. All above board, maybe, but does it really pass the pub test? Or does it just reinforce the fact that politicians take the public for mugs?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This