Federal ICAC now

Coalition MPs’ ‘study allowances’ pay for trip home from Indian wedding

Case for Federal ICAC
Dubious Travel Claims | Liberal Party | QED | The Nationals

Coalition MPs’ ‘study allowances’ pay for trip home from Indian wedding

June 2011

Coalition MPs Barnaby Joyce, Julie Bishop and Teresa Gambaro were flown to Hyderabad by Gina Rinehart in a private jet to attend a wedding and claimed more than $12,000 in “overseas study” allowances to pay for flights home, according to the Sydney Morning Herald

The three MPs were flown to India by mining magnate Gina Rinehart in a private jet, where they watched the granddaughter of her business partner marry in front of 10,000 guests.

Mr Joyce claimed a $5,500 flight home for him and his wife from Kuala Lumpur. The day of the flight, Mr Joyce met Malaysian officials at noon and at 3pm before flying home at 10pm.

Mr Joyce also claimed $3,600 in taxpayer entitlements for him and his wife to fly to Perth the day before the couple boarded the private jetabad. A spokeswoman said the couple attended “a range of official meetings with business people and Senate colleagues” in Perth.

Ms Bishop’s report says she briefly attended a “formal” wedding ceremony but argues the primary purpose of her trip was to meet Indian energy and infrastructure companies with Australian interests and lists eight such meetings.

In Ms Bishop’s “overseas study” report she says three of her meetings occurred on the day of the wedding.

Teresa Gambaro claimed $3,446 in “overseas study travel” for the trip, the purpose of which was to observe an international development program.

Read more.

What's a rort?

Conflicts of Interest

Redirecting funding to pet hobbies; offering jobs to the boys without a proper tender process; secretly bankrolling candidates in elections; taking up private sector jobs in apparent breach of parliament’s code of ethics, the list goes on.

Deceptive Conduct

Claiming that greenhouse gas emissions have gone down when the facts clearly show otherwise; breaking the law on responding to FoI requests; reneging on promised legislation; claiming credit for legislation that doesn’t exist; accepting donations that breach rules. You get the drift of what behaviour this category captures.

Election Rorts

In the months before the last election, the Government spent hundreds of millions of dollars of Australian taxpayers’ money on grants for sports, community safety, rural development programs and more. Many of these grants were disproportionally awarded to marginal seats, with limited oversight and even less accountability.

Dubious Travel Claims

Ministerial business that just happens to coincide with a grand final or a concert; electorate business that must be conducted in prime tourist locations, or at the same time as party fundraisers. All above board, maybe, but does it really pass the pub test? Or does it just reinforce the fact that politicians take the public for mugs?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This