Federal ICAC now

Bowen bills taxpayers $2000 for four-hour trip to Adelaide

Case for Federal ICAC
Dubious Travel Claims | Labor | QED

Bowen bills taxpayers $2000 for four-hour trip to Adelaide

February 2018

Chris Bowen billed taxpayers more than $2000 for a day trip to Adelaide, where he was the key speaker at a $500-a-head business lunch to raise money for South Australian Labor’s 2018 state election campaign, hosted at the offices of Ernst and Young.  

Guardian Australia obtained travel records showing that the then shadow treasurer Chris Bowen was in Adelaide for about four hours and spent 45 minutes of that time travelling to and from the airport. Bowen reportedly arrived in Adelaide’s CBD just over an hour before the fundraiser’s midday start, before returning to the airport at 2.05pm, immediately after the event finished, to return to Sydney. His four-hour trip to Adelaide cost $2,190 for flights and Comcar transfers, which was all charged to Bowen’s parliamentary travel allowances.

A spokeswoman for Mr Bowen claimed the fundraiser was not the dominant purpose of his trip. She said he held a press conference while in the city and that he had meetings relevant to his shadow ministerial role.

Read more

The Case for a Federal ICAC

What's a rort?

Conflicts of Interest

Redirecting funding to pet hobbies; offering jobs to the boys without a proper tender process; secretly bankrolling candidates in elections; taking up private sector jobs in apparent breach of parliament’s code of ethics, the list goes on.

Deceptive Conduct

Claiming that greenhouse gas emissions have gone down when the facts clearly show otherwise; breaking the law on responding to FoI requests; reneging on promised legislation; claiming credit for legislation that doesn’t exist; accepting donations that breach rules. You get the drift of what behaviour this category captures.

Election Rorts

In the months before the last election, the Government spent hundreds of millions of dollars of Australian taxpayers’ money on grants for sports, community safety, rural development programs and more. Many of these grants were disproportionally awarded to marginal seats, with limited oversight and even less accountability.

Dubious Travel Claims

Ministerial business that just happens to coincide with a grand final or a concert; electorate business that must be conducted in prime tourist locations, or at the same time as party fundraisers. All above board, maybe, but does it really pass the pub test? Or does it just reinforce the fact that politicians take the public for mugs?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This