Federal ICAC now

Andrew Laming’s $550,000 grant to rugby club with links to staffer

Case for Federal ICAC
Conflicts of Interest | Deceptive Conduct | Election Rorts | QED
Liberal National Party

Andrew Laming’s $550,000 grant to rugby club with links to staffer

2018 ongoing

 $550,000 grant was one of five grants awarded to the Southern Bay Cyclones rugby union club in the past three years through Andrew Laming.

The Queensland Liberal National MP Andrew Laming awarded a $550,000 grant to a rugby club with links to Laming’s electorate officer. The grant was awarded under the government’s controversial $150 million female sports facilities grants program.

According to Guardian Australia, the $550,000 grant was one of five grants awarded to the Southern Bay Cyclones rugby union club in the past three years through Laming. The four other grants nominated by Laming totalled $33,500.

The female sports facilities program was never open to applications, with projects selected as election commitments, with most located in Coalition-held seats.

80% of fund for female sports goes to Coalition seats

According to Guardian Australia, Laming awarded the Southern Bay Cyclones rugby union club the $550,000 grant for the redevelopment of a clubhouse at the Charlie Buckler Memorial sports field at Redland Bay.

The secretary of the Southern Bay Cyclones is James Eaton, who is married to Laming’s electorate officer, Stephanie Eaton.

There was reportedly no disclosure of the personal link bewteen the club and one of Laming’s long-serving electoral officers.

The other grants to the club included two volunteer grants worth a combined $8,500 and $25,000 in two separate grants under the Stronger Communities program.

Read more.

What's a rort?

Conflicts of Interest

Redirecting funding to pet hobbies; offering jobs to the boys without a proper tender process; secretly bankrolling candidates in elections; taking up private sector jobs in apparent breach of parliament’s code of ethics, the list goes on.

Deceptive Conduct

Claiming that greenhouse gas emissions have gone down when the facts clearly show otherwise; breaking the law on responding to FoI requests; reneging on promised legislation; claiming credit for legislation that doesn’t exist; accepting donations that breach rules. You get the drift of what behaviour this category captures.

Election Rorts

In the months before the last election, the Government spent hundreds of millions of dollars of Australian taxpayers’ money on grants for sports, community safety, rural development programs and more. Many of these grants were disproportionally awarded to marginal seats, with limited oversight and even less accountability.

Dubious Travel Claims

Ministerial business that just happens to coincide with a grand final or a concert; electorate business that must be conducted in prime tourist locations, or at the same time as party fundraisers. All above board, maybe, but does it really pass the pub test? Or does it just reinforce the fact that politicians take the public for mugs?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This